Health Guideline for world researchers (Level.3)

(Purpose and Background)
 In the current world, it is full of artificial objects—things that would be almost never time-evolved naturally through probabilistic material processes. In other words, we are mainly dominated in products created by the human brain. Meanwhile, humans themselves are evolved naturally through organism history during about 4 billion years. We are conceived through fertilization, nurtured in the mother’s womb, and brought into the world. Fundamentally, nature and artificiality are not compatible. For example, humans wear clothing, which is artificial, but after sweating heavily, it is not the skin but the clothing that retains unpleasant odor. Thus, clothing must be washed, and detergents composed of artifical materials are required for cleaning. Artificial things must be confronted by artificial means. In the current worlds, artifical materials produces the further artifical one in a synergistic manner, but these never harmonize the natural circular system. Insight against this matter is significant for human health.
 What is human health? The substances within the human body are constantly undergoing metabolic turnover through the circulation of energy. These processes are not artificial like synthesis within an industrial furnace. They follow the trajectory of nearly four billion years of biological evolution. Therefore, they are natural processes. Intuitively, health means getting into natural trajectory and throw ourselves into flow of natural river. Artificial products distort this natural flow like dams built for human convenience and preference depending on our brain. Our bodies are slowly (step by step) undermined by this dam like turbid river without our awareness,once we surpass our inherent adaptive threshold,it ultimately emerges as clinically apparent disease. Therefore, when considering health issues, we need to further understand "Nature" and "Artificiality", and conretely define what is Nature or Artificality in the context of modern society. In Nature-Artificiality axis, individuals had better position themselves closer to more natural side also as their ideology in order for humans to become healthier within contemporary society. Your next choice and behavior in daily life need to be natural more than ever, for example, you can choose walking, which overlaps with natural mobility of all organism, instead of your private car to go to supermarket. Therefore, in this health guideline for world researchers, I conduct a comprehensive examination of walking from multiple perspectives and seeks to reconceptualize its value.
 However, in recent years, the rise of computers, the Internet, smartphones, and artificial intelligence has shifted human life further toward the artificial side of the natural–artificial axis. Today’s youth often choose to look at screens and use SNS like this blog as communicative measure rather than converse with other humans in person. We don’t notice that, hidden behind the convenience we see on the surface, we are losing essential pieces required for life as biological beings, that is, the mediation of devices distorts auditory and visual cues, virtually eliminates olfactory and tactile sensation, and removes on-site atmosphere and texture. Something essential is lost from natural communication. If this persists for decades, catastrophic health and public-health problems may eventually manifest. For example, many people may lose vision crucially important for our quality of life, and this is one of the most essential human senses also in the human-evolutional perspective. Ironically, I am writing your English sentence as an unhealthy sedentary activity in order to communicate with you on health matter through SNS. If I were to discuss these important topics with you in person while walking and observing the expansive natural environment, how would the experience differ? For someone accustomed to walking every day, the answer is already obvious. I also re-consider about health matter during today's walking.
 Historically, in life sciences, pharmacology, and particularly medicine, clinical research on the health of individuals without overt disease has been undervalued. Research has prioritized understanding disease causes and having pharmaceutical treatments. This has shaped the modern medical ecosystem of hospitals, drug companies, and medical device manufacturers. When we become ill, we are inevitably incorporated into this medical ecosystem. However, health and disease are inseparable; they cannot be strictly divided. For example, even a cancer patient has daily life. By shifting their lifestyle toward the natural side—living regularly, exercising by walking, observing nature, relaxing, having empathetic face-to-face conversations, eating balanced meals, maintaining nasal breathing, regulating the autonomic nervous system, and conducting multifaceted oral hygiene with clean water can we truly say with certainty that such an approach is inferior to targeted pharmacological therapy? The most persons have not yet known the intrinsic (true) importance of healthy lifestyle, for example, in the perspective of human evolution and earth (also universe) history. We must ensure that appropriate information is provided and access to that information is guaranteed. My work is part of that effort. Such natural-leaning (inspired) lifestyle interventions do not harmonize with the current medical ecosystem. Hospitals hesitate to promote them, because such recommendations threaten their business model. If more people gained empathy for and adopted these practices, hospitals, pharmaceutical and medical-device companies would face serious financial decline. But can we simply declare such practices unnecessary based on this argument alone? We must critically and fundamentally reconsider our dependence on artificial objects in daily life, starting from a point far earlier than the historical perspective we typically imagine. Without doing so, medicine will not be able to change the current reality in which chronic diseases are widespread. We must recognize the limits of what can be achieved artificially and humbly reexamine biological history from a long-term perspective.
 This is not the matter easily able to resolve but hugely complex. Artificial materials are already deeply and adhesively embedded into modern society. Even I, despite my deeply awareness, cannot completely detach from them. Therefore, what is required today is that each person determines their own position in natural-artifical axis and take an interest in this issue and build your own conceptual framework and sense of purpose. Uniformity is unnecessary. Each individual can take a unique stance. However, to do so, we must objectively and subjectively understand what “Nature” is within modern society, and what its ideal state looks like. For example, many people today have impaired vision. Try looking at the world through that weakened eyesight—your visual field combined with other senses may reveal which aspects of society are artificial and which remnants of nature remain untouched. Even with myopia, your richly (human-like) colored visual perception can still and clearly paint the distant mountains beautifully onto the canvas of your brain.
 Life is essentially the management of energy. From this fundamental energetic perspective, I aim to establish dynamic equilibrium and homeostasis, review the history of energy intake, and attempt a redefinition of health. Through this process, I have determined that the most critical elements for health are physical activity and nutrition. Among forms of physical activity, walking is the most basic and commonplace. Health Guideline Level 3 rigorously interrogates this foundation while providing information to enable a fundamental reassessment of your life.